After passing by this restaurant almost every time I come to San Francisco I decided to try it with Mary. This area is not the easiest place to find parking but got lucky and found some parking less then 100 feet away. When I got there my first impressions were this restaurant caters to children. And 10 minutes later kids start coming in with their parents. I really like their appetizer menu and main menu on terms of design. The appetizer menu is on a ping-pong and the main menu is in kids books. I thought that was really creative I also give you goldfish for snacks aha.
I ordered: root beer float
Glass bottle root beer with vanilla ice cream
For appetizer: Fireball
cinnamon sriracha Buffalo wings with cinnamon cream
Entrées: Fried chicken and waffles monte christo
Fried chicken strips/Belgian waffles/raspberry jam/Swiss cheese/Maple syrup with powdered sugar.
The ringmaster: grilled chuck Burger/homemade glazed donut/cheddar cheese with bacon and fried eggs
The food was pretty good except it could have had a little more flavor also the appetizer with the cinnamon was kind of weird. Nonetheless I wouldn’t mind coming back there and eating.
Basketball / EASTER / RESTORATION PROJECT / SHOES
Four out of the five days of the week I play basketball. I started playing a while back seriously but the past year and a half I have taken it you more serious and also want to be in shape. After my 24 membership ended I decided to just go to open gyms and hoop because that’s what I would do when I go to 24 anyways for the most part.
thai food
deep-fried chicken wings served with sweet garlic sauce for a appetizer
And pineapple fried rice with chicken for dinner.
I think the restaurant was pretty good but I have had better pineapple fried rice in Berkeley so this would not be a first choice to come back to this restaurant but it isn’t bad. I would rate this restaurant from the food I had a B- or C+ at the most the presentation was well done but the food wasn’t all that great. But don’t take it for me to go try it for yourself.
BAY AREA NIGHT SHOOT PART 2
All photos are copyrighted and you will need permission to use them.
BAYY AREA NIGHT SHOOT
bay bridge led show
—
bcc
brunch plus week
The food is great here and I will be coming back sooner or later. After that I decided to stop by undefeated to pick up a T-shirt and figuring out I didn’t feel like going home just yet we went to the park. I grew up going to this park when I was a kid and love to go down the slide but I did not try that this time.
Diamond supply X The hundredsUndefeated coach jacket supreme zebra five panelAnd Jordan aqua 8’s
jordan royal 1 2001 vs 2013 comparison
First of all want to start of and say this is going to be my first Comparing jordan retros. I decided to do this comparison since this is one of my favorite Jordan one colorways. My favorite colorway from the ones are the bred AKA banned.
I was lucky enough to win two raffles for the 2013 royal blue ones with the help of Mary. I’m not a reseller so I will probably hold on to both of the shoes unless the price is right. Let’s get into the comparison.
The 2001 royal blue ones are Made in the era when Jordan Brand produce quality shoes. Nowadays Jordan Brand releases and produces shoes that will cause the most hype and it doesn’t matter on the quality because people will still pay top dollar for a pair of Jordans. Such as the Jordans that come out around Christmas anyways.
The 2001 release came with a retro card and a Jordan jumpman keychain.
Another difference is the classic Jordan face box. The 2013 version is a retro Of the 1985 box. I would love to have a comparison of the 1985 royal blue but I don’t so this is the closest comparison I can do. I’m not sure on the retail price but I have an idea it was either between $79 and $120 in 2001. The 2013 retail price is $140.
style code | 136066 041 | |||||||
colorway | black/royal blue | |||||||
year of release | 2001 |
style code | 555088 085 | |||||||
colorway | black/varsity royal-black | |||||||
year of release | 2013 |
On the 2001 pair the Insole has a jumpman logo and on the 2013 pair it has a Nike air logo Also the lining on the 2001 pair Has more cushioning and is better material than the 2013 pair.
Another difference is on the 2013 pair it is considered a high and the 2001 pair is considered a mid so you can see the Difference in height. The Nike sign on the 2001 pair is a suede material and on the 2013 pair it is more of a leather material.
Overall my thoughts on the 2013 pair is it was a must cop for me because it’s one of my favorite Jordans that have ever came out. The material and craftsmanship of the shoe is pretty good I have to say made way better then most of the shoes that come out nowadays besides some quick strike releases this is a premium quality shoe for the year 2013 made by Jordan brand/ nike. I would rate the 2001 pair a 9 out of 10 and the 2013 pair 8.5 out of 10.
san francisco zoo + the week
Later in the week I want to Kincaid for a late dinner after watching the 49ers lose the Super Bowl. The food was great here but overpriced which was expected.Later that week I made dinner for my mom for Valentine’s Day also made dessert.
– Some of my outfit rotation for the week
Black scale tenderloin project tee
button up
Huf rain jacket
supreme beanie
Nike huarache light
Diamond supply x Mighty healthy
the hundred’s denim
2001 jordan true blue III
Undefeated fleece
Diamond supply x Rogue status
The hundreds denim
2001 Jordan royal blue I